'Electoral College Essay'

'The electoral College is not on the voter turnouts cast at one time by the existence but by a root of the great unwashed select by the citizens. This radical of officials known excessively as presidential electors is the electoral College. individu each(prenominal)y state is designate a accepted number of candidates. In total, the join States has 538 presidential electors. These officials decide which candidates every last(predicate)ow for become the nigh president and wrong president of the United States. I cypher the Electoral College should be abolished for many reasons. To take with, it gives more than saddle to the votes cast in small states. Second, since the Electoral College is winner takes all, people who discord with the majority in their state ar not represented. Finally, the people should have the castigate to choose who govern their country since they atomic number 18 capable exuberant to do so.\nThe electoral map could be used to urge for abo lishing this simply because of complexity. likewise it shows how unfair the dodge is. A candidate, who loses usual California by a a couple of(prenominal) votes, receives no electoral votes to show for his or her effort. ( muniment A). The Electoral College gives disproportional power carnal knowledge to the states vote, which favors smaller states with more electoral votes per person. It delegacy that the smaller states are overrepresented and their votes have more weight than they should per person, compared with larger populations have slight weight per person. I think its unfair.\n base in Document B The autarkical candidates - Anderson in 1980 and Perot in 1992 - received no electoral votes. This is unfair. Anderson got 7% of the democratic vote; Perot got 19% of the popular vote. The winner-take-all Electoral College agreement caused Anderson and Perot to disappear electoral vote in the court. It elbow room that the candidate who receives the near popular votes wi ns all the electoral votes of that state. So 7% of the population in 1980 and 19% in 1992 did not participate in the election. This is unfair because ... '