Friday, September 13, 2013

Employement Law

Memorandum To: Human Resource Director From: Date: family 25, 2012 Subject: profound Analysis and possible liability minimize This memorandum looks at exploit alleging that the club has violated the blank grind Standards form of 1983 (FLSA) 29 U.S.C. § 207(a), and unsanded York state faithfulness of nature by failing to lucre the plaintiff, George Michael, all overtime wages. Michael is active by the guild, Vision Media, as a regional music director of gross revenue trustworthy for generating publicize gross revenue for the company, which comprises the majority of revenue for the company. The company has a sales provide responsible for selling advertising space; a selling staff responsible for creating promotional activities and materials that will increase advertising sales and an editorial staff responsible for the contents produced by the media. The company believes that he is an administrative employee and because exempt from receiving over time e arnings Issue The legal issues in this case is whether not mercantile Michael overtime leave constitutes discrimination on non-payment of overtime pay as stipulated in Fair Labor Standards Act of 1983 (FLSA) 29 U.S.C. § 207(a), or is he an exempt employee performing administrative duties and and so not liable for overtime pay.
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
Rule The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1983 requires that employees working overtime in excess of twoscore hours per hebdomad must be compensated one and a fractional times their regular pay per hour worked (FLSA, Id. § 207(a)). This law though does not apply to some employees including administrative employ ees (FLSA, Id. § 213(a) (1). The New York ! vow laws also enforce these exemptions by cover that employees should be paid their overtime dues subject to the FLSA provisions. In this case scenario, the company bears the send of proving that Michael falls within the exemption (Chatfield v Childrens Services, 2008) showing that he was an administrative employee. Application An administrative employee as defined by rules promulgated by...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay