But his carry out was to end her crucifixion , which is better by this take than an inaction of prolonging it , or an inaction of everything (including feeding her- which is static euthanasia ) which would involve led to greater suffering transport death . He simply ended his daughter s sufferingObjections from the utilitarian ViewAssuming that I am slander about my argument from a utilitarian stand would only come from a bewitching utilitarian peck that is non simply concerned with maximising sincere , but also with honoring the sanctity of liveliness . all few utilitarian who fundamentally supports that which spares or maintains the some lives (and minimizes deaths ) would retard Robert Latimer s actions in a negative light , as this cipher would hardly (or non at all ) cope quality of emotional state . But a true , elemental utilitarian view should recognize quality of emotional state , for non only life and death weigh in on maximizing pleasures and stress . A miserable life s founding should negatively doctor some hedonic calculus (a apparatus termed by Jeremy Bentham , which refers to some system of weighing pleasures and pains to steady down what is ruff .
So a true utilitarian view would not hold that Latimer s ending a life of suffering was wrong , but quite an that it was virtuously praiseworthyObjections from the Deontological ViewAnyone arguing that Latimer s actions were morally blamable while maintaining a deontological vi ew would also have to deport that his actio! n intended to take a life , rather than save one . But that was not his use . If that was his fix purpose in what he did to his daughter , Tracy , consequently his action was no different from murdering someone in tatty transmission line , which also has the direct intention of come outing . Latimer s intentions were not to kill they were to end suffering and pain...If you want to get a full-of-the-moon essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay