Freakonomics vs. the Tipping Point

After reading information on the tipping focalize and freakonomics, I have found NO correlation at ALL. These apparent horizons be so totally antithetic that they atomic number 18 like crude oil and vinegar. In the passage Levitt believes that deprave dropped in the 1990s because of roe vs. walk (the juristicization of abortion).Levitt believes that poor country should abort their cast-off(prenominal) kids, if this takes bottom crime will decrease. The unwelcome children will eventually stop into criminals and raise the crime rate. I personally believe this is so far from the truth. I am from a poor family who was raised in the projects; we are majestic hard working people who strive for greatness. This is America, so everyone has the chasten to the first amendment Freedom of dialect. On the different blow over Malcolm Gladwell has a totally different view of crime decreases. His view depicts crime decreasing delinquent to more Police power, Gladwell believes if there are more natural law that people would ease up less crime. I agree, if there are more legal philosophy patrolling crime would be very minimal. I in truth agree with both sides, you would have less crime if unwanted children are aborted and you would have less crime if police patrol more. Works Consulted Works Cited A smaller point to also consider: Gladwell left taboo one other major reason that, according to Levitts research, crime did dismount to sink in the 1990?s: the waning of the violent crack trade. (Thanks to Darren Rovell for pointing out the Gladwell blog.) Gladwell, Malcolm. Freakonomics. Freakonomics. Malcolm Gladwell, n.d. Web. 1 Apr. 2011.If you want to get a respectable essay, effectuate it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay